by
Dave Lambert
on Fri 18 Aug 2006 10:16 AM PDT
By
The Editors, National Review Online (8/18/2006) …
Once upon a time, the courts of the United States acted in the interests of the United States.
They knew that international affairs, the conduct of war, and the protection of
Americans from foreign threats stood far beyond the judicial ken. As Supreme
Court justice Robert Jackson wrote in 1936, sensitive matters of foreign policy
and national security involve “decisions of a kind for which the
Judiciary has neither aptitude, facilities nor responsibility and which has
long been held to belong in the domain of political power not subject to
judicial intrusion or inquiry.”
Enter Anna Diggs Taylor, chief judge
of the federal district court in Detroit.
She has just purported to find unconstitutional the Bush administration’s
Terrorist Surveillance Program (TSP) — an early-warning system crucial to
protecting the nation from attack. In so doing, she has become the latest
jurist to illustrate how far we have strayed from Justice Jackson’s
wisdom.
The entire article can be found at… http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=NGU2OWE5YzEyZjk4NzI5ZWU1NWQ5YWFhZTdkNzk3MWU=